GPT Researcher vs Vane

Two of the top search, side by side: score, setup, license, activity and what each review found.

33rd of 5 in Search

GPT Researcher

Research agent that writes cited reports from web and local documents

64 out of 100
#44th of 5 in Search

Vane

Self-hosted answer engine with cited sources over SearXNG

55 out of 100
GPT Researcher vs Vane: score parts and facts
What we compareGPT ResearcherVane
Score parts, out of 100
Adoption69, popular86, widely used
Freshness100, active100, active
Maintenance99, healthy9, weak
Easy to run33, some setup33, some setup
Agent-ready0, none0, none
Facts from GitHub and the README
Stars30k37.2k
LicenseApache-2.0 (permissive)MIT (permissive)
Last commitOct 2026Sep 2026
Last releaseSep 2026Apr 2026
LanguageNot statedNot stated
DockerYesYes
GPUNot neededNot needed
arm64 or Apple SiliconNot statedNot stated

GPT Researcher

Planner and execution agents generate research questions, scrape 20+ sources, filter passages (Jev by default, BM25 fallback with no key) and write cited reports over 2,000 words, exportable to PDF and Word. Runs as a FastAPI server on port 8000 with a static or Next.js frontend, or as a pip package; local PDF, Office, CSV and Markdown files can be sources. For analysts automating long-form research.

Who it is for: Analysts and developers automating long-form research

Strengths

  • Deep Research mode: tree-like exploration, about 5 minutes and $0.40 per run on o3-mini
  • Hybrid retrievers: Tavily plus MCP servers such as GitHub as research sources
  • Works with any OpenAI-compatible endpoint via OPENAI_BASE_URL
  • Multi-agent LangGraph and AG2 variants produce 5-6 page PDF, DOCX and Markdown reports

Weaknesses

  • Default setup needs OpenAI and Tavily API keys
  • Jev context filtering needs a TYPESAFE_API_KEY; the fallback is keyword BM25
  • Python 3.12 or later required
  • Disclaimer labels the project experimental and for academic purposes
  • no GPU
  • Docker + Compose
  • Needs OpenAI or OpenAI-compatible LLM API, Tavily API key (default retriever), TypeSafe API key (optional Jev filter)
  • Models: OpenAI models, any OpenAI-compatible endpoint via OPENAI_BASE_URL, Gemini 2.5 Flash Image (inline images)
  • port 8000

Vane

Next.js answer engine (formerly Perplexica) that runs searches through a bundled SearXNG instance, then answers with citations using Ollama, OpenAI-compatible servers, OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini or Groq models. Offers Speed, Balanced and Quality modes, web, discussion and academic sources, image and video search, file uploads and a search API. One container on port 3000; a slim image uses your own SearXNG.

Who it is for: Self-hosters replacing Perplexity with local models

Strengths

  • Single Docker image bundles SearXNG; no search API key needed
  • Local models via Ollama or any OpenAI-compatible server, plus cloud providers
  • Browser search-engine shortcut via /?q=%s and a REST search API
  • Slim image works with an existing SearXNG (JSON format and Wolfram Alpha enabled)

Weaknesses

  • No authentication yet; listed as an upcoming feature
  • Own-SearXNG setups must enable JSON output and Wolfram Alpha or searches fail
  • Tavily and Exa search backends are marked coming soon
  • Ollama on Linux must listen on 0.0.0.0 for the container to reach it
  • no GPU
  • Docker + Compose
  • Needs SearXNG (bundled in the default image), LLM provider (Ollama, OpenAI-compatible server or cloud API)
  • Models: Ollama, OpenAI, Anthropic Claude, Google Gemini, Groq
  • port 3000

More in Search